South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 017 246)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how a social worker managed Mr X’s case because there is no worthwhile outcome we could achieve by investigating. We cannot investigate the Council’s actions in matters subject to court proceedings.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the social worker was unprofessional and biased during his family’s case that was considered in court proceedings. He believes this has caused him undue distress and financial loss.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
    • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation; or
    • the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings in a closely related matter.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains the social worker was biased in support of the mother of his children. He believes the social worker encouraged no contact between his children and himself. The Council cannot direct arrangements between the children’s mother and Mr X over residence and contact; those matters are for the court. It would be reasonable for Mr X to raise his concerns in existing court action.
  2. The court action that may have caused distress or financial loss to Mr X was decided by the court, not the Council. It is unlikely further investigation would find a direct connection between the Council’s actions and any injustice caused separately to Mr X. So, we will not investigate this point as there is nothing we could achieve.
  3. We cannot consider Mr X’s complaint about matters that have been subject to court proceedings. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been raised and considered in court proceedings, including evidence and reports the Council provided.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome we could achieve by investigating and the law prevents us from investigating the Council actions in or for the court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings