Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (23 006 530)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to consider his complaint about a social worker’s court report until ongoing court proceedings have concluded. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about a social worker’s court ordered addendum report completed in ongoing court proceedings. Mr X says the report includes untrue and libellous comments about him which could lead to him having little, if any, contact with his son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the contents of a social worker’s Section 7 addendum report for the court in his ongoing child custody case.
  2. The Council told Mr X it was unable to accept his complaint due to the ongoing court proceedings. It advised Mr X he could raise his concerns with his legal representative and told him it could consider his complaint once the court proceedings have concluded.
  3. There is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider Mr X’s complaint until the ongoing court proceedings have concluded. This is in order to ensure the court proceedings, which must take precedence, are not prejudiced.
  4. If Mr X remains dissatisfied with the Council’s final response to his complaint, once it has considered it, we can assess it to see whether it is about a matter we can and should investigate. However, the law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court. We have no discretion to do so. This restriction also applies to reports which are submitted to the court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider his complaint until ongoing court proceedings have concluded.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings