Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (23 000 286)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council’s scrutiny committee in holding its children’s services department to account. The complaint is generalised and there is not enough claimed personal injustice to Mrs X to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained via a representative that the Council’s scrutiny committee has failed to hold its children’s services department to account. She said she and her representative spoke for 2000 families.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The complaint concerns the actions of the Council’s scrutiny committee in response to Ofsted reports. Neither the complaint to the Council nor the complaint to us is a complaint of personal injustice arising from fault. They are both generalised complaints that do not meet the criteria for alleged personal injustice laid out in the Local Government Act 1974 as given in paragraph 2.
  2. If Mrs X wishes to complain of personal injustice arising from fault by the Council, she would be welcome to bring the matters back to us, via her representative or personally, having first complained to the Council. We might then decide we can and should investigate them.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough claimed personal injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings