Bristol City Council (22 016 564)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Mar 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delay in the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services. This is because investigation could not ascertain the extent of any fault on the Council’s part.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss X, complains that the Council has delayed the handling of her complaint under the statutory procedure for complaints about children’s services.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X has made a complaint to the Council about the involvement of children’s services with her and her family. She complains that the Council has delayed Stage 2 of the complaints process. She wants the Ombudsman to take on the consideration of the complaint.
  2. The Council says it initiated Stage 2 of the complaint and appointed an Investigating Officer and an Independent Person. It says Miss X indicated that she did not want to proceed until she made a Subject Access Request and received a response. It says it is waiting to hear from her before restarting the process.
  3. While the complaint is within the statutory process it is not appropriate for the Ombudsman to consider its merits. We have the discretion to accept complaints referred to us early, but this is only appropriate once Stage 2 is complete and both parties request our involvement. Neither is the case here, and we will not accept the complaint now.
  4. While the consideration of the complaint is suspended, it is not possible to ascertain the length of the delay, if any. If Miss X wants the process to restart, she should tell the Council. As it stands, the Ombudsman would not be able to ascertain the extent of any fault on the Council’s part. Our intervention is not warranted at this stage.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because we could not ascertain the extent of any fault on the Council’s part.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings