Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (22 001 498)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council being biased in favour of Mr X’s former partner in a dispute about the custody of children. The matters complained of are not separable form matters where Mr X has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council was biased in favour of the mother of his children. He said it had lied to him and constantly moved the goalposts, making it impossible for him to have a meaningful relationship with his children. He wanted the Council to apologise and change its stance on backing his former partner’s bid for sole custody.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has used their right of appeal, reference or review or remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The disputed residency and contact arrangements for children are always matters for a court. The Council’s actions in supporting one partner rather than another are not separable from that and could be raised in court.
  2. It is not clear whether a court has yet been approached, but if so, the restriction against us investigating non-separable matters becomes absolute and lasting.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the matters he complains of are not separable from matters in respect of which he has a right to go to court it would be reasonable to use. If someone has already applied to a court, there is an absolute bar against us investigating these matters, regardless of the outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings