Stoke-on-Trent City Council (21 013 420)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s potential responsibility for a data breach. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider responsibility for the breach. We cannot investigate court action.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council was responsible for a data breach that saw her personal information shared with another family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) exists to establish where there have been data breaches and who is responsible for them. Given the Council denies it was responsible for the breach that occurred, it would be for the ICO to consider that.
  2. The breach occurred at the time of the filing of papers with a court for a court case. The likely involvement of a court order concerning the filing of papers for a case suggests that, even if responsibility for the breach were not disputed, we would be unable to investigate the matter complained of. This is because the filing of papers for a court is part of court action.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because:
  • the ICO is better placed to attribute responsibility for the data breach; and
  • we cannot investigate court action or what happened in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings