Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Kingston Upon Hull City Council (19 014 579)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jan 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a potential breach of her personal data. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is the appropriate body to consider her concerns.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, complains about a potential breach of her personal data

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered Mrs X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information she provided. I also gave Mrs X the opportunity to comment on a draft statement before reaching a final decision on her complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X says she complained to the Council, but it sent her a response meant for somebody else. The Council has accepted this but has not explained how the mistake happened. Mrs X wants an explanation and is worried the Council might have mixed up other personal information.
  2. Data protection and information handling is at the heart of Mrs X’s complaint. The ICO is the UK’s independent authority set up to uphold information rights. It promotes openness by public bodies and protects the privacy of individuals. It deals with complaints about public authorities’ failures to comply with data protection legislation. This includes wrongly disclosing personal information. The ICO has wide powers to take action against data controllers – such as councils.
  3. There is no charge for making a complaint to the ICO, and its complaints procedure is relatively easy to use. Where someone has a complaint about data protection, the Ombudsman usually expects them to bring the matter to the attention of the ICO. This is because the ICO is in a better position than the Ombudsman to consider such complaints. It is the expert body set up by Parliament to consider such matters. Mrs X should therefore contact the ICO as it is the appropriate body to consider her concerns

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is the appropriate body to consider her concerns.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page