Torbay Council (19 007 684)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman should not investigate Mr J’s complaint about his daughter’s social worker. There is nothing we could add to the Council’s investigation and we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr J complains that his daughter’s social worker did not use a pedestrian crossing when carrying his daughter across a busy road. This caused a risk of harm.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’.
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information Mr J provided with his complaint, and information provided by the Council when we asked about its response to the complaint. I have given Mr J the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr J’s daughter is in the Council’s care. He saw her social worker carry her across the road. He says the social worker did not use the pedestrian crossing. Mr J complained to the Council about this.
  2. The Council does not accept that the social worker endangered Mr J’s daughter, but has undertaken to remind staff to use pedestrian crossings. There is no CCTV evidence available so it is unlikely we could achieve more than this, if we investigated the complaint ourselves.
  3. Mr J is seeking to have the social worker dismissed. This is not a recommendation we can make, so we cannot achieve what Mr J wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we could add to the Council’s investigation, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mr J wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings