London Borough of Lambeth (19 004 155)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the accuracy of the Council’s court report on her application for a special guardianship order. The Council has agreed to deal with the complaint at stage 3 of the statutory complaint procedure.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council’s social worker provided an inaccurate report to court regarding her application for a special guardianship order for two children she cares for. Ms X says she only had a few days to consider the report before a court hearing was due. Ms X says the report damaged her self-esteem. She wants the report amending and for the Council to ensure the same thing does not happen to other people.
  2. Ms X complains the Council delayed in dealing with her complaints.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if satisfied with action the Council has agreed to take.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Ms X’s comments and spoke to her by telephone. I have clarified the position with the Council and considered its stage 2 complaint reply to Ms X.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The stage 2 report says Ms X complained to the Council in December 2017. The Council replied to the complaints in February and April 2018. In May 2018 Ms X asked the Council to go to stage 2 of the complaint procedure.
  2. On 4 February 2019 the Council sent Ms X its reply at stage 2 and its investigation report. Stage 2 upholds Ms X’s complaint. The Council apologised to Ms X and offered her compensation. On 8 February Ms X requested stage 3 which is review by a panel.
  3. The Council discussed with Ms X a complaint to this office rather than going to stage 3 because it had reached a final view of the complaint.

Back to top

Analysis - agreed action

  1. I will not investigate this complaint. I consider a stage 3 panel is best placed to consider what happened including the complaint handling. The panel can consider whether the Council has done all it should to avoid a repetition of the problems identified in the stage 2 report.
  2. The Council has agreed to deal with the complaint at stage 3 of the statutory complaint procedure.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the accuracy of the Council’s court report on her application for a special guardianship order. The Council has agreed to deal with the complaint at stage 3 of the statutory complaint procedure.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings