East Sussex County Council (18 011 933)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council holds false information about her. The complaint is better suited to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, says the Council’s children services team holds inaccurate information about her and her family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word 'fault' to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Ms X provided with her complaint. Ms X had the opportunity to comment on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X has a child with additional needs. The Council produced an Education Health and Care Plan to set out how it intended to meet those needs. Ms X is appealing its wording to a Tribunal.
  2. Ms X says she made a subject access request, under Data Protection rules. This means she asked the Council to provide her with information it held about her. Ms X says this information showed the Council holds information about her which she says is false and can be read and used by other professionals.

Analysis

  1. Parliament set up the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) to oversee and decide some disputes on data protection issues. The records Ms X says are false are children services records which have specific and complex recording requirements. The ICO is better placed to decide whether the Council should hold the disputed information.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the ICO is better placed.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings