Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Isle of Wight Council (17 016 302)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Feb 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs M’s complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the accuracy of a report its children services team produced for a Court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs M, says the Council failed to reply properly to a complaint she made about its reports given to a Court.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate the consequences of a decision if we cannot investigate the decision itself. (R (on the application of ER) v CLAE  and London Borough of Hillingdon [2014] EWCA Civ 1407 and R (M) –v- CLAE [2006] EWHC 2847)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mrs M provided with her complaint which included the Council’s replies to that complaint. Mrs M had an opportunity to comment on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs M has five children. She says she was involved in court proceedings to decide the children’s care arrangements from December 2014 to February 2016. She says the Council produced two reports for the Court about the children’s lives and their welfare. These are called section seven reports (s7). The Council produced them because the Court ordered it to.
  2. Following the conclusion of Court proceedings, Mrs M obtained the information the Council held on the case. She then complained in April 2017 about the accuracy of the s7 reports. The Council provided detailed replies but then refused to correspond further.
  3. Mrs M complains about the way the Council complied with its own complaints policy.


  1. We have no power to investigate the content of s7 reports. This means we also have no power to investigate how the Council dealt with a complaint about those reports.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because it is about Court reports and how the Council replied to a complaint about those reports.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page