London Borough of Croydon (22 005 260)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 11 Oct 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council delayed consideration of a complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. The Council has now agreed to resolve the complaint by providing an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused to the complainant by its delay.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mr X, is represented by his advocate. Mr X complains about how the Council dealt with matters relating to his housing after he left the Council’s care. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman when the Council delayed responding to his complaint at stage two of the statutory children’s complaints procedure.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused an injustice, we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share the final decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

The statutory complaints procedure

  1. The law sets out a three-stage procedure for councils to follow when looking at complaints about children’s social care services. The accompanying statutory guidance, Getting the Best from Complaints, explains councils’ responsibilities in more detail.
  2. The first stage of the procedure is local resolution. Councils have up to 20 working days to respond.
  3. If a complainant is not happy with a council’s stage one response, they can ask that it is considered at stage two. At this stage of the procedure, councils appoint an investigator and an independent person who is responsible for overseeing the investigation. Councils have up to 13 weeks to complete stage two of the process from the date of request.
  4. If a complainant is unhappy with the outcome of the stage two investigation, they can ask for a stage three review by an independent panel. The Council must hold the panel within 30 days of the date of request, and then issue a final response within 20 days of the panel hearing.
  5. Councils can only vary from the statutory complaints procedure in exceptional circumstances. Regulation 8 of The Children Act 1989 Representations Procedure (England) Regulations 2006 says councils can refuse to consider a complaint if to do so could prejudice concurrent court proceedings. However, after the proceedings have ended, a complainant can resubmit the complaint for the council to consider.

What happened

  1. Mr X’s advocate complained to the Council’ on Mr X’s behalf about how it had dealt with matters relating to Mr X’s housing after he left the Council’s care. In April, Mr X’s advocate asked the Council to escalate the complaint to stage two of the complaints process. The Council say it separated the housing issues into a corporate complaint and planned to consider other elements under stage two of the statutory procedure. It has however recently agreed with Mr X’s advocate that it will now proceed with a stage two investigation, considering all matters under the statutory procedure.
  2. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault. This because its handling of the complaint has meant it failed to complete its stage two investigation into Mr X’s complaint within the statutory timeframes. This has caused a delay in Mr X receiving answers to the questions he raised in his complaint.
  3. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice this caused Mr X by completing its investigation without further delay. We also asked the Council to offer to make a payment to Mr X of £200 within one month of the date of my final decision, to remedy the time and trouble he has been too pursuing his complaint and to reflect the delay in providing him with a stage two response.
  4. To its credit, the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and offer to make the payment to Mr X within one month.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings