Liverpool City Council (21 012 100)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council not providing financial assistance to her granddaughter while at university. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council wrongly ended payments under a special guardianship order (SGO) when her granddaughter went to university, and this is causing financial hardship.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. I shared a draft of this decision with Mrs X and invited her comments.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Special Guardianship Regulations 2017 state that financial support to special guardians ceases at age 18, or at the time when the young person leaves full-time education, which can be later. University education is higher education, so it is not included in this. Mrs X understandably points out that she and her husband are of an age when they are no longer working, and that supporting a young person through university is financially difficult. I also note that there is a significant difference between the Council’s duties to a young person who has been subject to an SGO, and what its potential duties might be to a young person subject to an SGO who has also been looked-after by a council, even if that period of being looked-after was only brief. However, the Council’s refusal to offer financial support to Mrs X’s granddaughter does not breach the Special Guardianship Regulations 2017.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings