Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

London Borough of Wandsworth (17 020 079)

Category : Children's care services > Looked after children

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Apr 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: we cannot investigate this complaint about Ms X’s contact arrangements with her child. This is because the matter has been considered in court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I have called Ms X, complained that the London Borough of Wandsworth has stopped her having contact with her child who lives with a family in Holland under a Special Guardianship Order.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information provided by Ms X. I have considered the complaint documents provided by the Council. I invited Ms X’s comments on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. A Special Guardianship Order (SGO) is a Family Court order which gives the holder parental responsibility of a child until he or she reaches the age of 18. The order enables the Special Guardian the make day-to-day decisions on behalf of the child.

Key facts

  1. Ms X’s child lives with a family in Holland. The family has a SGO for the child. The Family Court in England granted the SGO, which includes contact arrangements between Ms X and her child.
  2. Ms X’s child is now resident in Holland. The SGO has been registered with the Dutch courts. The Family Court in England no longer has any jurisdiction in the matter.
  3. Ms X says the Council has stopped her having contact with her child. She wants her contact reinstated and increased. The Council said it has no legal standing in the child’s life and advised her to take action through the Dutch courts.

Analysis

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint.
  2. Ms X’s contact arrangements with her child were decided in an English court. The SGO has now been registered with the Dutch courts as Ms X’s child is resident in Holland. As the matter has been considered in court we cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint. I explained the reason for this in paragraph 3.
  3. It seems it is the Special Guardians - not the Council - who may be preventing contact between Ms X and her child. If this is the case, it is open to Ms X to go to court in Holland to enforce the terms of the SGO. Similarly, if she wants to increase contact with her child, she would have to go to court in Holland.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because the matter has been considered in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page