Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (19 008 331)

Category : Children's care services > Friends and family carers

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman should not investigate Mr and Mrs J’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to provide special guardianship support. This is because Mr and Mrs J live in another council’s area, so we are unlikely to find fault.

The complaint

  1. Mr and Mrs J complain that the Council has refused to reinstate and backdate special guardianship allowance, in light of their daughter D’s recent diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’.
  2. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the information Mr and Mrs J provided with their complaint, and given them the opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I have also considered the statutory guidance on special guardianship.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Council looked after D before Mr and Mrs J obtained the special guardianship order (SGO) for her care, approximately 10 years ago. Mr and Mrs J live in another council’s area, which I shall call Anyshire Council.
  2. The guidance says that the placing council (in this case, Newcastle upon Tyne City Council) was responsible for assessing (and, if necessary, providing) SGO support for the first three years after the SGO was made. After that, responsibility transfers to the council where the special guardians live (in this case, Anyshire Council).
  3. The Council has advised Mr and Mrs J to contact Anyshire Council about SGO support. So it has acted in accordance with the guidance and it is unlikely we would find fault.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman should not investigate this complaint, because it is unlikely we would find fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings