Stoke-on-Trent City Council (24 002 884)

Category : Children's care services > Fostering

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this late complaint about a fostering placement and a child protection investigation following it. Mr X could have approached us sooner, and there is thus no good reason to exercise the discretion available to us to consider these late matters.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council mismanaged a fostering placement as well as a child protection enquiry afterwards that took too long.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The correspondence between Mr X and the Council stated the foster placement lasted from November to December 2022. It also stated that Mr X stated the child protection enquiry concluded in April 2023.
  2. All the matters complained happened more than 12 months before Mr X approached us. We may consider late matters if a person is unaware of them at the time, or if a person is prevented from approaching us. Neither reason applies here. Mr X was aware of all the matters he now complains of by April 2023 at the latest, most of them significantly earlier than that. The correspondence states he made a subject access request to the Council in July 2023 before complaining to it in March 2024. It told him after two weeks that his complaint was late and invited him to provide any evidence why it should consider it. It was not necessary for Mr X to make a subject access request before contacting us. He could have contacted us at any time after April 2023, but did not do so until May 2024, more than a year after the last of the matters complained of, and 17 months after the original matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late and there is no good reason to exercise the available discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings