Brighton & Hove City Council (22 007 530)

Category : Children's care services > Fostering

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s fostering service. That is because the complaint is late.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s fostering services treatment of her as a foster carer. She said it failed to provide appropriate respite and that it discriminated against her. She is unhappy in how the Council ended a foster care placement. She said the Council’s actions had harmed her physical and mental health. She said despite the Council’s suggested improvements she is not satisfied it will not make the same mistakes again.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X and her husband were approved as foster carers in 2019. The Council placed a young person into their care at the start of 2020. The Council ended that placement in November 2020. Mrs X subsequently complained about the support the Council provided to them as foster carers and its decision to end the placement.
  2. Mrs X complained to the Ombudsman at the end of August 2022. Therefore, this is a late complaint and we should not investigate. We have discretion to set this aside where there are good reasons, however, in this case, I have decided not to exercise discretion as it was reasonable for Mrs X to have complained to us sooner.
  3. However, even if the complaint was not late, we would not investigate. That is because there is nothing further we could add to the Council’s investigation. The Council has accepted there was fault in its communication with Mrs X and in the support it provided to her and husband. It has also apologised for not involving Mrs X in its decision to end the foster care placement. In its stage two response, the Council specified its learning from Mrs X’s complaint and set out recommendations it was undertaking to improve its fostering service. Therefore, there is nothing worthwhile to be achieved by further investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is a late complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings