Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (25 023 801)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the support provided by the Council to his child who was sectioned under the Mental Health Act. The Council upheld part of the complaint and an investigation by us is unlikely to achieve more. An investigation into Mr X’s complaint that an officer fell asleep during a supervised visit is unlikely to achieve any meaningful outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the support provided by the Council in relation to his child, Y, who was sectioned under the Mental Health Act. Mr X also complained about the Council’s complaints handling.
  2. Mr X said the matter caused him frustration, uncertainty and distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Access to medication

  1. Mr X complained a Council officer brought medication onto a secure ward where his daughter was sectioned.
  2. In its complaint response, the Council upheld this complaint. It explained it had addressed the matter directly with the officer and accepted this should not have happened.
  3. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve anything else, so we will not investigate this complaint.

Fell asleep during overnight supervision

  1. Mr X complained the officer fell asleep during an overnight 1:1 supervision session of Y.
  2. In its complaint response the Council said its officer denied this and there was no evidence from third parties to corroborate the allegation.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. We could not say, even on a balance of probabilities, that the worker fell asleep. Consequently, there is no worthwhile outcome achievable and so we will not investigate.

Complaint handling

  1. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we decide not to investigate the substantive issue. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings