Southampton City Council (25 018 227)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate the Council’s preparation and content of a Court ordered children services’ report. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about safeguarding matters as it is reasonable to expect Mr X to have told the Court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council’s children services team has been biased against him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council’s replies to him.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s reply to Mr X’s complaint sets out the Court ordered the Council to produce a Children Act 1989 section seven report about a child’s welfare and circumstances to aid its decision making in a child arrangement order application. Mr X believes the officer who produced this report was biased against him. He also has concerns the Council failed to properly consider safeguarding referrals he made about the child’s other parent’s care of the child concerned.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the content or preparation of section seven reports. These form part of court proceedings. We are barred from investigating what happens in court as set out in paragraph two above.
  3. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to have told the Court of any safeguarding issues. The Court has wide powers to order the Council take action or assess the case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot investigate the preparation or content of a Court ordered report. And it is reasonable to expect Mr X to have told the Court about his concerns.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings