Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (25 016 801)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her children’s case between 2011 and 2023. The law says we cannot consider complaints about matters that have been considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. The complaint also lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s handling of her children’s case between 2011 and 2023. Miss X says that during the court proceedings she was assessed and incorrectly diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder. She says the Council knew this but for the past ten years it has denied her reasonable contact with her children who are subject to care orders.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council about its handling of her children’s case between 2011 and 2023. The case was considered in court proceedings and the children were subject to care orders.
  2. The Council told Miss X it would not consider her complaint via its complaints procedure because it was about events that happened well over 12 months ago. It signposted Miss X to this office.
  3. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been subject to court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. This restriction also means we cannot consider the Council’s actions in the proceedings nor can we consider complaints about any evidence or reports the Council provided to the court during the course of the proceedings.
  4. Decisions about where Miss X’s children live and contact arrangements will have been considered and made by the courts. The issues raised by Miss X are inextricably linked to the court proceedings and we cannot consider them.
  5. The complaint also lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late, but due to the restriction set out in paragraph 9, above, we could not have considered this complaint even if it had been made in time.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and the law says we have no discretion to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings