Sheffield City Council (25 008 364)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s contact with the Council. This is because the Council has already investigated, apologised for fault for some of the complaint and provided an explanation for its actions. Therefore, further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council did not contact him about referrals made to Children’s Social Care and then did not notify him when it provided family support to his children. This has caused negative impact on his mental health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X said the Council failed to contact him following a referral being made to it by another organisation. He also said they didn’t inform him of support it then offered to one of his children.
  2. The Council accepted there was fault in not contacting Mr X after the initial referral, explained what should have happened and apologised. It also acknowledged a delay in clarifying which child was receiving support in early 2025 and apologised. Finally, the Council also explained it could not divulge further details about Mr X’s concerns due to data protection and safeguarding restrictions.
  3. In this case, the Council has accepted errors, apologised, and fed back learning to staff. Additionally, it provided an explanation for its actions and limitations about what it could share. And these responses appear reasonable. It is unlikely further investigation would achieve anything more for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings