Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council (25 006 473)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s complaint because it is a disproportionate use of public resources to do so.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has not responded to his complaint, which he said obstructed him from obtaining information about his concerns.
  2. He would like the Council to apologise to him and investigate his concerns.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the way it had dealt with a children’s matter.
  2. Mr X says the Council would not provide him with information he requested from it or respond to his concerns without confirmation of consent from the people involved in the matter.
  3. Mr X complained to the Ombudsman on the basis he has been caused an injustice as he was unable to obtain the information he wanted from the Council.
  4. We are not looking at the substantive complaint about how the Council has handed the children’s matter, which does not form part of Mr X’s complaint to the Ombudsman.
  5. We will not usually investigate a complaint about a Council’s complaint handling process where we are not considering the substantive issues complained of.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it would be a disproportionate use of resources to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings