London Borough of Camden (25 004 816)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s personal data. This is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to investigate this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council mishandled his personal data and did not correct his records or hold staff accountable.
  2. Mr X complained that the Council have caused him significant psychological harm and distress.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to correct his records and provide a formal apology.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained that information was shared by another organisation in a Child Protection Conference that did not relate to him.
  2. According to the information available, the Council contacted the other organisation to clarify this, who told the Council the information shared about Mr X was correct. The Council referred Mr X to make a complaint about the other organisation.
  3. Mr X made a Subject Access Request (SAR) relating to information the other organisation held about him, and this was shared by the Council at a subsequent case conference.
  4. We will not investigate. If Mr X remains unhappy about the Council’s records, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is the UK's independent regulator about data protection matters and is best placed to deal with any concerns Mr X has in this regard. In any case we cannot direct the Council to change its records and therefore, we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings