London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 001 166)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the alleged bias of the Council in its dealings with Mr X. The opinions formed by a social worker have already been provided to a court. A legal bar thus prevents us considering the views expressed and the way in which they were formed.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council was biased in its treatment of him, minimising his ex-partner’s behaviour and leaving his concerns unanswered or ignored. He said a social worker was biased in what she wrote, inconsistent in communicating with him, and oppressive in her practice. He said he was worried this would continue as she came to write a report that would be used in any court case concerning the care of his children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has started court action about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  4. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I note in passing that the Council’s own investigation found some fault in the way it had dealt with Mr X. However, the documents Mr X supplied show there was a court hearing in late 2024 at which the views of a social worker about him were presented in writing when he sought to take his children overseas for a holiday. That triggers an absolute and permanent legal bar that prevents us investigating these matters. I appreciate Mr X is concerned that what was written may again be presented to a court in the future. That is speculative, but it is because those views have already been presented to a court, that we cannot investigate how they were arrived at, even if that might in other circumstances be potentially a matter of fault.

Back to top

Final deecision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because a legal bar prevents us investigating matters that happened in court, or which were or could reasonably have been raised in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings