West Sussex County Council (24 021 740)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the actions of a social worker. This is because part of Mr X’s complaint is late and there are no good reasons why they could not have been made to us sooner. Of the matters remaining there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the actions of a social worker involved in supporting his child. He argued the Council’s actions caused him stress and wanted the issues to be investigated under the Children’s Statutory Complaints Procedure.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by Mr X and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X made a complaint about the actions of the social worker supporting his child, in 2023. He subsequently said the Council did not properly investigate this complaint at the time. This is an issue Mr X has been aware of for more than 12 months since he complained to us. There are no good reasons why he could not have raised them with us earlier and therefore, I will not exercise discretion to consider these matters now.
  2. Mr X complained the written correspondence he received from the Social Worker was of poor quality. He complained about the length of time taken to contact him. In its complaint response the Council explained its reasons. Given it’s reply, I will not investigate this part of Mr X’s complaint as there is not enough evidence of fault in the actions of the Council.
  3. Mr X said the Council should have investigated his complaint using the Children’s Statutory Complaints Procedure. However, it is unlikely we would find fault the Council replied to his complaint using its Corporate Complaints Procedure.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because part of his complaint is late and there are no good reasons why it could not have been made sooner. Additionally of the parts remaining there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings