Sunderland City Council (24 021 462)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint the Council has failed to properly safeguard her grandchild. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our involvement. We also could not add to the Council’s response.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has failed to properly safeguard her grandchild. She wants the staff involved to face disciplinary action for their mistakes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We may investigate complaints made on behalf of someone else if they have given their consent. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(1), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained to Mrs X that it is supporting her grandchild through a child protection plan. The Council has explained it cannot provide detailed information to Mrs X about her grandchild because she does not have parental responsibility for them. Mrs X does not have consent from her grandchild or anyone who has parental responsibility to complain on their behalf.
  2. Child protection plans are one of the highest levels of intervention councils can take to meet their statutory duties to safeguard children in their area from harm or a risk of harm. This shows the Council has taken concerns about Mrs X’s grandchild seriously. It is unlikely we would find evidence of fault in that respect.
  3. We could not add to the Council’s explanations to Mrs X as we are also limited in the information we could provide to her about her grandchild. Mrs X has expressed a wish for the Council to take a disciplinary action against the Social Workers involved. We would not be able to achieve this outcome as any disciplinary actions between the Council and its employees fall outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault. We also cannot achieve the outcomes the complainant wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings