Portsmouth City Council (24 020 376)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s actions and decisions in its child protection involvement with her family. The complaint lies outside our jurisdiction because it is about matters that have been considered and decided in court proceedings. The law says we cannot consider complaints about such matters.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains she has been wrongly accused, judged, lied about and bullied by the social worker allocated to her child. She says that as a result of this, her son has been removed from her care and placed with prospective adopters following Family Court proceedings. Miss X says the social worker did not recognise the positive changes she had made.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council about the matters set out in paragraph one, above.
  2. The Council told Miss X it could not consider her complaint because it was made about events that happened more than 12 months ago and about decisions made by the Family Court. It advised Miss X to seek advice from her legal representative on the matters raised.
  3. We cannot consider Miss X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is about matters that have been considered and decided in court proceedings. The law says we have no discretion to consider complaints about such matters and cannot do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction and the law says we cannot consider it. This is because it is about matters that have been considered and decided in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings