Cheshire East Council (24 011 395)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to investigate a safeguarding concern including a social worker’s conduct. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and an investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council wrongly started a safeguarding investigation after receiving a referral about a concern. He also complained a social worker involved, acted unprofessionally. He said this caused him distress. He wants compensation and for the social worker to be reprimanded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation.
    (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council received a safeguarding referral about Mr X. A social worker visited Mr X’s home to explore the safeguarding concerns and complete an assessment. As a result of the investigation, the Council found there were no safeguarding concerns and closed the case.
  2. Mr X complained the Council should not have taken the safeguarding referral seriously because it was based on an untrue allegation.
  3. Mr X also complained the social worker was unprofessional during the home visits and made comments which caused distress.
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to begin a safeguarding investigation after it received a referral. There is no evidence of fault by the Council for its decision. The Council had a legal duty to make enquiries after receiving the referral.
  5. Nor will we investigate Mr X’s complaint the social worker was unprofessional during their home visits and made comments they should not have. The Council has already considered this complaint and explained why the social worker acted as they did. It has apologised to Mr X for any offence caused by the social worker's comments. An investigation by us into this matter would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault and further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings