London Borough of Enfield (24 011 212)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council treating Mr X as vexatious and allegedly discriminating against him. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council treating him as a vexatious complainant from early 2023 onwards. He said it had discriminated against him because he has disability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We would not expect any council to deal continually with a very high volume of correspondence from one member of the public, even if this was the result of a disability. The Council supplied a copy of its letter to Mr X imposing restrictions on his contact. This referred to the volume and frequency of his correspondence that was making it difficult for officers to carry out their usual duties, and provided him with a single point of contact so he could continue to correspond and the Council to reply effectively. It also stated when the decision would be reviewed and told him he could appeal against the decision. The letter met the standard we would expect of a council when treating a person’s contact as unreasonable or vexatious.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings