Kingston Upon Hull City Council (24 007 776)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a child protection decision by the Council as there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council failed to consider a child protection matter properly, and based its decision on a statement her child made when traumatised. She said her child now regrets what they said.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council received a safeguarding referral about a child of Mrs X, and it fell to the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO) to call a multi-agency meeting to consider what action to take.
  2. The child had sustained injuries. Mrs X did not dispute there had been an incident at home. She said the child had attacked their father and that the child had been violent to family members due to trauma. The child’s account was that they had been assaulted by their father. Those present at the multi-agency meeting decided unanimously the child had suffered significant harm. That Mrs X disputed how the injuries came about does not mean investigation by us of the LADO’s actions would be likely to lead to a finding of fault in how they reached the decision. Nor does Mrs X’s claim that the child has since changed their account mean we would be likely to find fault with how the Council reached its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because doing so would be unlikely to lead to a finding of fault about how the Council reached its decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings