London Borough of Lewisham (24 003 214)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Aug 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to respond to a children services complaint because it could reasonably be or has been mentioned as part of legal proceedings on a closely related matter.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has failed to respond to his July 2023 complaint about children’s services.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. On 27 July 2023 Mr X complained to the Council it had failed to carry out a section 17 Child in Need assessment and failed to act to prevent homelessness despite having information at the time that the state of his property was affecting his children’s health and he was at risk of eviction. He says the Council has never responded to this complaint.
  2. I will not investigate because this could reasonably be or has been raised as part of legal proceedings on a closely related matter. I say this because:
    • Mr X applied to the Administrative Court seeking Judicial Review of the Council on related matters. Of relevance, in a Court Order dated 25 July 2023, the Court noted Mr X had been requesting a s17 assessment and accomodation for some time, including recently in June 2023. Rather than create further satellite litigation it said the Council should consider carrying out a s17 assessment as part of its stage 2 investigation which was due to complete by 25 August 2023. It gave permission for Judicial Review on this ground.
    • Mr X applied to the Court of Appeal to appeal the above mentioned Court Order. Within his submissions to the Court of Appeal he said the Council had not completed the stage 2 investigation by 25 August 2023.
  3. Although the 25 July 2023 Court Order predated Mr X’s 27 July 2023 complaint, it concerned closely related matters. I consider Mr X’s substantive complaint and his complaint about the Council’s lack of response could reasonably be or, have been mentioned as part of legal proceedings, with reference to the Judicial Review and/or application to the Court of Appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it could reasonably be or has been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings