Suffolk County Council (23 018 747)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jun 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X and Ms Y’s complaint about the Council’s actions in its child protection involvement with their family because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been considered in court proceedings. We cannot do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainants, Mr X and Ms Y, complain the Council is biased against them and started care proceedings for their son based on hearsay, conjecture, false statements and manipulated evidence. They complain the Council took this action due to a previous police investigation relating to Mr X and because of Ms Y’s disability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X and Ms Y complained to the Council about matters relating to its child protection involvement with their family and its decision to start care proceedings.
  2. The proceedings recently concluded and Mr X and Ms Y asked the Council to consider their complaint. The Council said it would not consider the complaint via its complaints procedure because it was about matters that had been subject to and decided in the court proceedings. It explained its complaints procedure cannot be used to challenge the court’s decisions and as they were party to the proceedings they would have had the opportunity to raise their concerns to the court during the proceedings.
  3. We cannot consider this complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law says we cannot investigate complaints about matters that have been considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. Any dissatisfaction with the outcome of the court proceedings would need to be returned to the court. We cannot consider it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X and Ms Y’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and the law says we cannot consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings