Medway Council (23 018 561)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council's child protection involvement with her family because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from considering complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, complains about the Council’s child protection involvement with her family. Mrs X says her children have been unlawfully removed from her care due to abuse of power by the parties involved. The matter is subject to ongoing care proceedings.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about its child protection involvement with her family which is subject to ongoing care proceedings.
  2. The Council initially accepted Mrs X’s complaint, but later told her it could not consider it after it found there were ongoing care proceedings. It said the matters Mrs X raised in her complaint would be considered in the proceedings.
  3. We cannot consider Mrs X’s complaint. Complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings lie outside our jurisdiction and the law prevents us from considering them. We have no discretion to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and we have no discretion to consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings