Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (23 015 002)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions in the course of child protection action and in the production of a report the complainant regards as inaccurate. This is because we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr X, complains that the Council was at fault in the course of child protection action in respect of his family, producing an inaccurate report which remains on its file.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s family was the subject of child protection action. The Council’s case is now closed. Mr X contends that the Council’s action was flawed and potentially left his family at risk. He says the report completed in the course of the child protection investigation is inaccurate and gives a false representation of him.
  2. Mr X is concerned that the report remains on the Council’s file and may potentially be seen by his children in future. As the case is closed, he wants the Council to remove the report from its records.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome he is seeking. We will not ask a council to alter or remove content from its records retrospectively. This is because the records reflect the position at the time they were produced. The most we will normally seek is that a council place a record of the complainant's dissenting views on file. Mr X has already set out his views on the accuracy of the report when making his complaint. This also forms part of the case record and our intervention would achieve nothing more.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome he is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings