Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (23 002 756)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to investigate his substantive complaint until an ongoing police investigation has concluded.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, complains about a Child and Family Assessment completed by the Council. Mr X says the assessment was completed without his input or involvement and it contains factual inaccuracies.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about its completion of a Child and Family Assessment without his input or involvement. He also complained it contained factual inaccuracies.
  2. The Council told Mr X it would not consider his complaint until an ongoing police investigation is concluded as the information in the assessment was closely inter-linked with this. It explained the statutory guidance gives it discretion to decide whether to consider a complaint where there are ongoing proceedings such as criminal proceedings. This is in order to avoid prejudicing those proceedings. It told Mr X it could consider his complaint once the police investigation has concluded.
  3. There is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider Mr X’s substantive complaint until an ongoing police investigation has concluded. This is to ensure any other proceedings, which must take precedence, are not prejudiced by any complaint investigation. It is a decision the Council is entitled to make. If Mr X is dissatisfied with the Council's final response to his substantive complaint once he has received it he can ask us to consider it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider the complaint until the police investigation has concluded.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings