Liverpool City Council (23 001 727)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about children services decision to have a child protection plan. There are no good reasons why the late complaint rule should not apply.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, says the Council should not have had a child protection plan for his children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says a Council children services’ officer provided a child protection conference with misinformation. He says this meant the conference decided to have a child protection plan. He says this ended in June 2022. He says that following a Tribunal appeal about education matters, he decided to complain about the child protection decisions.
  2. The Council says it held the child protection conference which led to a child protection plan in May 2021. It says Mr X’s complaint is therefore over 12 months old and it will not reply to the complaint as it is too late. It also says it advised Mr X, at the time, of the appeal process against the decision to recommend a child protection plan.
  3. The decision Mr X complains about, and the officer’s actions, were in May 2021. It has taken him two years to pursue his complaint. He says the Tribunal action took over his time. On balance this is not a good enough reason to disapply the 12 month rule.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there are no good reasons why the late complaint rule should not apply.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings