Birmingham City Council (22 007 867)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council have treated the complainant as a Person Posing a Risk to Children. This is because the events happened too long ago and we cannot add to the investigation already carried out by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Miss X, complains that she was incorrectly classified as a Person Posing a Risk to Children (PPRC) by the Council in 2011. She also complains that the PPRC remains on her children’s services file to this day and is likely to have a negative impact on the Council’s assessment of her contact arrangements with her children. Miss X wants the status removed from her file with confirmation put in writing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the original decision for her to be classified as a PPRC. I appreciate this is an important issue for Miss X but, given the time that has passed, it is unlikely we could carry out a thorough and robust investigation into this element of her complaint.
  2. I will not investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council’s records still show her as having PPRC status. This is because in its response to Miss X’s complaint, the Council has confirmed that Miss X does not have PPRC status. Therefore I do not consider that further investigation could add to that already carried out by the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because some events happened too long ago and we could not add to the Council’s investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings