Stoke-on-Trent City Council (22 005 620)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Aug 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the complainant’s children’s social worker. This is because we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss B, complains that her children’s social worker has been at fault in her involvement with her and her children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss B’s children are the subject of care orders placing them in the Council’s care. Miss B complains that the social worker does not take account of her opinions and disregards the changes she has made in order to have the children returned to her care. She also complains about the way the social worker speaks to her eldest daughter. Miss B wants the social worker removed from the case and for the Council to uphold her complaint.
  2. The Council considered Miss B ‘s complaint and found no fault on the social worker’s part. It did not agree to remove her from the children’s case.
  3. The Ombudsman will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome she is seeking. The Council’s response to Miss B’s complaint appears comprehensive and, without evidence of fault in the way the Council considered the matter, we cannot intervene to substitute an alternative view. Neither can the Ombudsman require the Council to reassign the case to a different social worker. It is for the Council to decide how to allocate cases to its staff.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome she is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings