Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council (20 010 618)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the way the Council responded when a young person left the complainant’s care. This is because the matter has been considered in Court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr C, complains about the Council’s response to the decision that a young person should no longer live with his family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. The Courts have said that we cannot investigate a complaint about any action by a council, concerning a matter which is itself out of our jurisdiction. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr C and his partner had care of three children who were siblings. The relationship the oldest sibling had with the rest of the family deteriorated over time. In 2020 Mr C and his partner decided that the young person’s behaviour, and the danger he posed to the other children, meant the placement would have to end. Mr C says that the Council pressurised him and his family to take the young person back and failed to intervene when he went to live in an unsuitable placement.
  2. The Council took the issue of the young person’s care to Court. Mr C complains about the content of the assessment the Council carried out, which he says was inaccurate, and about the evidence the Council gave in Court, which he regards as amounting to perjury.
  3. The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr C’s complaint. The matters about which he complained were referenced in the evidence presented to the Court in the public law proceedings brought by the Council. By law, this places them outside our jurisdiction. This applies to the evidence and the way it was produced and presented. We can take no view on its accuracy or otherwise. There is no discretion available to us on this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot not investigate Mr C’s complaint because it concerns matters which have been considered in court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings