London Borough of Haringey (20 009 266)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s child protection involvement with her family because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, complained the Council made false allegations about her and tried to place her two children in foster care via family court proceedings. Ms X also complained about the information the Council provided to the court.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complains about the Council’s decision to start court proceedings in its child protection involvement with her two children and about its actions in relation to this. Ms X complains the Council provided incorrect and incomplete information to the court during the proceedings.
  2. Ms X also complains about the Council’s handling of her complaint and its decision not to consider her complaint at stage two of its complaints procedure because it was out of time.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint. It lies outside our jurisdiction because it is about, or inextricably linked to, matters that have been considered in court proceedings. The law prevents us from considering complaints about such matters. We have no discretion to do so.
  2. We will not investigate complaints about complaint handling issues where we are unable to consider the substantive complaint. This is because it is not a good use of limited public resources for us to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings