Nottinghamshire County Council (20 006 469)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about what the Council recorded or failed to pass on. The outcome he seeks is one more appropriate for a court and it would be reasonable for him to return there.

The complaint

  1. Mr X says the Council failed to tell him about an assessment of his child it carried out. He says if he had known about his, it would have been easier to demonstrate to a court the poor childcare by his former partner and her new partner. He says the Council also formed a negative view of him and underestimated the issues with the former partner. He says the result has been significant time, trouble, cost, and stress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read Mr X’s complaint and the complaints correspondence sent by the Council. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on a draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. A court decided the contact and residence arrangements of Mr X’s child, following the end of the parental relationship. The Council accepts there were errors in social work, including not sharing an assessment of the child it carried out in 2018 with Mr X. It apologised for these. Mr X wants his legal fees reimbursed and compensation for the stress caused to him.
  2. It was open to Mr X to rebut evidence he disagreed with in court. It would be reasonable for him to seek a court order for fresh contact and residence arrangements if he wishes to challenge the current ones.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X has a right to return to court it would be reasonable for him to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.