Surrey County Council (20 006 397)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X complaints about the child protection the Council gave her as a child. The events are over 20 years old and there are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, says the Council failed to protect her from harm while a child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Ms X provided with her complaint and the Council’s reply to her which it provided. I considered Ms X’s comments on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X says she was born in 1990. She says the Council’s social services team were involved with her family due to the quality of her mother’s parenting. She says the Council removed her from her mother’s care in 1997. She says the Council should have done so years before. She says in failing to do so, she was exposed to harm for longer than she should have been.
  2. Ms X complained to the Council this year. It said the events were too old. It advised her to seek legal advice.
  3. We can only investigate a complaint about events known to the complainant for more than 12 months if there are good reasons to do so. Here there are not because:
    • I am not confident there is a realistic prospect of reaching a sound, fair, and meaningful decision. Given the time elapsed it will be more difficult to find out the material facts with reasonable confidence and we are less likely to be able to gather enough evidence to reach a sound judgement.
    • I am not satisfied that Ms X could not reasonably be expected to have complained sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because there are no good reasons why the late complaint rule should not apply.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings