Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Leeds City Council (19 017 339)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council holds inaccurate information about her and shared it with other people. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, says the Council’s children services team holds inaccurate information about them.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word 'fault' to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Ms X provided with her complaint. Ms X had the opportunity to comment on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X says the Council gave false information to professionals involved with her child. She says it holds information on its records saying Ms X suffered from an illness which she says she has medical proof showing she did not. Ms X says she has requested that this information be corrected. She says the Council has refused.
  2. The Council said in February 2020 that it does not hold inaccurate information and has not shared it with third parties.
  3. The Data Protection Acts give Ms X a right to ask the Council to provide all the information it holds on her, so she can check if there are inaccuracies. She also has the right to ask for any inaccuracies to be change. Parliament set up the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) to consider DPA disputes. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to apply to the ICO.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the ICO is better placed.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page