Kingston Upon Hull City Council (19 010 528)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Jan 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council producing inaccurate minutes. It is unlikely we would achieve a significantly different outcome than the Council provided of placing her comments with the minutes.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Mrs X, says the Council produced inaccurate minutes of a meeting and delayed in replying to her complaint.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word 'fault' to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
    • the injustice is not significant enough to justify the cost of our involvement, or
    • it is unlikely we could add to any previous investigation by the Council, or
    • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mrs X provided with her complaint and the Council’s replies to her. Mrs X had the opportunity to comment on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council in May 2019 that it had produced inaccurate minutes for a children services meeting in March 2019. The Council replied in July and then in October 2019. It agreed to place Mrs X’s complaint letters, which set out the errors she claims, next to the minutes. It apologised for the delay in replying to her complaint.

Analysis

  1. It we were to investigate, it is unlikely we would achieve a significantly different result than already provided. Placing the claimed mistakes next to the minutes is the remedy for inaccurate minutes which we usually consider acceptable.
  2. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve a significantly different result.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings