Essex County Council (19 009 464)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Nov 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A’s complaint that the Council has refused to amend its files to remove false information it holds about him. This is because he can bring his concerns to the attention of the Information Commissioner, who is better placed than the Ombudsman to consider them.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr A, complains that the Council has refused to amend its files to remove false information it holds about him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr A has said in support of his complaint.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr A says he is not permitted to have unsupervised access to his grandchildren. He argues that this is because the Council has records of allegations against him which can prove to be false. Mr A wants the Council to fully investigate the alleged incidents and to alter its records to show that the allegations against him were malicious. The Council has refused to amend the records. It has referred Mr A to the Information Commissioner.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr A’s complaint. It concerns the accuracy of the Council’s records. This is a matter which can be referred to the Information Commissioner, who is better placed than the Ombudsman to consider such complaints.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr A may bring his concerns to the attention of the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings