Kingston upon Hull City Council (17 016 077)

Category : Children's care services > Adoption

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jan 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr F’s complaint as it is about the quality of evidence and information the Council’s children services team gave a Court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mr F, says the Council’s children services team carried out inadequate work with his family.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  2. We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mr F provided with his complaint. Mr F had an opportunity to comment on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr F’s child, D, left its biological parents’ care in October 2013. Mr F says the Council took D into its care without the parents’ agreement. He says in 2014 a Court ordered D should be cared for by the Council and issued an order agreeing to an adoption.
  2. Mr F says the Council did not do enough with the family to keep D within the family. He says the Council failed to carry out the number of assessments recommended by a psychologist. He also says the Council gave the Court inadequate information. He says the Court criticised the Council’s approach and work.
  3. Mr F says he has not complained until now as he believed his solicitor had on his behalf.

Analysis

  1. We cannot investigate the adequacy of evidence given by a Council to a Court.
  2. It is reasonable to expect Mr F to have told the Court of his concerns about the Council’s work if he believed it affected his case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint as we cannot look at issues considered by a Court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.