Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 50317 results

  • London Borough of Harrow (24 005 159)

    Statement Upheld Transport 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: There was fault by the Council in how it handled Mr B’s application for a blue badge and his appeal about this. The Council cannot show how it considered that Mr B had suffered recent falls. It is wrong to say that it can only use the information he provided. It should have considered whether he was complaining about the conduct of the assessor when he appealed the Council’s decision to renew his blue badge. This has left Mr B uncertain that his application and appeal was properly considered, but it is unlikely that a fresh review would mean the Council decide he is eligible for a blue badge. The Council has agreed to take action to remedy the injustice.

  • Cheshire East Council (24 001 596)

    Statement Upheld Alternative provision 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: Mrs X complained that the Council failed to provide alternative education from the end of June 2023 to February 2024 when her child was unable to attend school on health grounds. We have found fault causing an injustice. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a symbolic payment for the lost education and service improvements.

  • St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (24 001 806)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council delayed finalising his child’s education, health and care plan and it provided him with misleading information. The Council acknowledges it is at fault, the delay frustrated his appeal rights and caused avoidable distress. The Council has agreed to provide Mr X a payment to reflect the avoidable distress caused.

  • Cheshire East Council (24 010 724)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s initial refusal of her request for a transfer, which was reversed at the review stage.

  • Essex County Council (24 011 172)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council delayed carrying out an Education Health and Care needs assessment for a child. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by apologising and offering to make a suitable payment to the complainant to remedy the injustice this caused.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 011 351)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the decision from the Council to withdraw her direct payments. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council (24 011 576)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council removed his relative from his care and investigated under its safeguarding procedures. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. We are unlikely to find evidence of fault, and we cannot achieve the outcomes requested.

  • South Cambridgeshire District Council (24 010 804)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Disabled facilities grants 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a disabled facilities grant or the Council’s decision not to waive a local land charge. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

  • East Lindsey District Council (24 011 671)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council (24 012 443)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 23-Dec-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s recovery of business rates or court action. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened at court.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings