Decision search
Your search has 54156 results
-
Stoke-on-Trent City Council (24 012 535)
Statement Not upheld Other 14-Jul-2025
Summary: Miss D complained that Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB and Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust failed to provide her with appropriate care following her discharge from long-term inpatient care. We found no fault with the care and support provided to Miss D by these organisations.
-
NHS Staffordshire and Stoke-On-Trent ICB (24 012 535a)
Statement Not upheld Mental health services 14-Jul-2025
Summary: Miss D complained that Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB and Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust failed to provide her with appropriate care following her discharge from long-term inpatient care. We found no fault with the care and support provided to Miss D by these organisations.
-
Portsmouth City Council (24 016 978)
Statement Upheld Charging 14-Jul-2025
Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to inform her when she became responsible for paying for her care. We find the Council at fault for failing to transfer her to the appropriate team for a financial assessment and for poor record keeping. This has caused avoidable uncertainty. The Council agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her its proposed financial remedy.
-
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (24 017 819)
Statement Not upheld Other 14-Jul-2025
Summary: On behalf of an environmental trust, Ms X complained the Council terminated a lease agreement without following the correct procedures and processes. Ms X says without the lease the trust will be wound up. We have discontinued our investigation as the law says we cannot usually investigate a complaint when it is reasonable for the matter to be taken to court.
-
London Borough of Harrow (24 012 853)
Statement Not upheld Disabled children 14-Jul-2025
Summary: We have found no fault with how the Council handled Mrs X’s son’s blue badge application. It followed the correct procedure as required by the Department for Transport’s guidance.
-
Cheshire East Council (24 013 037)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 14-Jul-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the refusal of free home-to school transport for Mrs X’s child. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the school transport appeal panel reached its decision to warrant our further involvement. We cannot investigate the actions of a school.
-
Cheshire & Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (24 012 535b)
Statement Not upheld Mental health services 14-Jul-2025
Summary: Miss D complained that Stoke-on-Trent City Council, Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB and Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust failed to provide her with appropriate care following her discharge from long-term inpatient care. We found no fault with the care and support provided to Miss D by these organisations.
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (24 015 325)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 14-Jul-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with Mr X’s homelessness application as it is late. We will not investigate the complaint about the suitability of Mr X’s accommodation as there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 004 576)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Private housing 14-Jul-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his reports about gas safety in his private rented sector property. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
Leicestershire County Council (25 000 462)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 13-Jul-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council named an unsuitable college in Miss Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan or that it failed to deliver the content of the EHC Plan to Miss Y. This is because Mrs X had a right to appeal the content of the EHC Plan to the SEND Tribunal.