South Holland District Council (24 017 640)

Category : Benefits and tax > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's handling of a business rates account as it is unlikely we will find fault, or fault causing a significant injustice, by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains she was harassed by e-mail by the Council for information about her tenant in respect of business rates liability. Mrs X says she was recuperating from a serious illness at the time and found it difficult to cope with the Council's demands.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault, or fault causing a significant injustice, to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X is unhappy as she says the Council sent her several emails about the occupancy of her business premises. Mrs X says she did her best to provide the information that was required but found it difficult as she was seriously unwell at the time. Mrs X found the Council's emails to be threatening.
  2. While I recognise that Mrs X remains unhappy about how the Council handled this matter, we will not investigate as I consider it is unlikely we will find fault if we did so. The Council is duty bound to collect business rates and must make any enquiries it considers necessary to ensure the correct person is billed. I understand this may this may have caused Mrs X some inconvenience and stress, made worse undoubtedly as she was ill at the time, but this does not equate to evidence of fault by the Council. Even if there was clear evidence of fault, this is not a complaint that we would take further as from our perspective, the injustice claimed is not sufficient to justify our further involvement. We have limited resources and must direct them to the most serious of cases. I do not consider this to be such a case
  3. For these reasons we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council, or of a significant injustice being caused to Mrs X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings