London Borough of Hillingdon (22 014 559)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about business rates as Mrs X had the right to dispute her liability in court and it is reasonable to expect her to have done so.
The complaint
- Mrs X complains the Council wrongly billed her for business rates when the lease she had signed with the building owner said she would not be liable for them. Mrs X also complains the Valuation Office Agency gave incorrect information to the Council about the rateable value of the building.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We have the power to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been, raised within a court of law. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
- We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of the Valuation Office Agency as it is not a body within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34A, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mrs X does not accept she was liable for business rates but entered into a payment agreement with the Council to avoid further recovery action.
- Disputes about business rates liability are decided in the Magistrates’ court and it was open to Mrs X to present her case in court, rather than pay the charge. We consider it would have been reasonable for Mrs X to do this and by paying the charge, Mrs X has essentially accepted liability for it.
- The Valuation Office Agency (VOA) is not a body within our jurisdiction and so we cannot investigate any complaint Mrs X might have about its actions.
- For these reasons, we will not investigate.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the Magistrates’ court was best placed to hear Mrs X case against liability and it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to have presented her case in court rather than pay the charge
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman